|
ECI differentiates a "bonus" from an "incentive
plan" by whether or not the participants have clear
knowledge of what is required to "earn" the potential
payment. We have identified a number of factors which
should be considered by Management in developing an incentive
compensation plan:
1. Plan Concept and Objective
Developing a clear statement of the objective of the
plan is critical and yet is probably the most difficult task.
Usually, the most practical approach is to address questions
such as:
- What types and levels of personnel should the plan cover?
- Should the plan reward corporate, division or individual
performance or a combination?
- Is the plan primarily for the purpose of rewarding
increased performance or attracting new personnel (in which
case it may be necessary to "replace" benefits
lost by an employee leaving a prior employer)?
- Is a purpose of the plan to provide "golden
handcuffs"?
2. Importance of Forecasting
Certain incentive plans require essentially no
forecasting while others require accurate forecasting.
While many companies find the goal setting and performance
measurement activity one of the key advantages of having an
incentive plan, it is important to select an incentive plan
which is consistent with the company's forecasting needs and
abilities. The two most frequent problems in this area
are:
Low Level Targets: Management frequently
expresses an interest in defining incentive targets by
department or even by individual. ECI favors this
approach where possible, since such goals are more likely to be
within the "control" of the participants.
Unfortunately, we rarely find companies with sufficient
confidence in department or individual forecasting/target
setting to base incentives solely on this criteria. More
typically, such low level targets are used to "adjust"
incentives based on division or corporate performance.
Long Term Targets: Management often
expresses an interest in basing awards on long term (two to five
years) performance but many have difficulty establishing
accurate targets over this period.
3. Ease of Communication
For an incentive plan to be effective, it must be
understood by the participants. Many incentive plans are
very simple and straightforward, and are easily communicated.
Others are so complicated that it is very difficult for managers
to understand them, or to "track" their progress and
their potential incentive payments.
4. Comprehensiveness
Many "cash" incentive plans base the
incentive pool on corporate net profits only. Frequently,
it may be appropriate for an incentive plan to consider other
objectives, such as division profitability, revenue growth,
productivity, or other factors. As a minimum, there should
be a determination as to whether performance measures other than
net profit would be considered.
5. Discrimination
Many incentive plans have built in the ability to
discriminate in payments between employees who are superior
performers and employees who are sub-standard performers over
the term of the plan. In other types of plans
(particularly stock based and "profit sharing" plans).
the relative performance of individual executives over the term
of the plan is not recognized.
6. Integration with Total Compensation Program
Management should consider what effect the incentive
plan may have on total direct compensation costs (e.g., whether
salary increases should be lessened for bonus eligible
positions). In addition, incentive payments will need to
be taken into account with respect to benefit programs typically
based on W-2 compensation, such as pension, profit sharing, life
insurance, long-term disability, and other programs.
Ideally, these factors would be addressed first and
resolved. In practice, the development of an
incentive plan often involves an iterative process of forming a
plan concept, examining and testing alternatives, and refining
the plan concept further.
|